This church has been brought to renewed prominence by the opening of the Vezneciler Metro Station in 2014. As one surfaces on the escalator, one is faced with a perfect Byzantine church (41.013187,28.960133). The interior is lined with attractive marble and gives rise to a pleasant monochrome, appropriate for reverential activity should one be in the mood.
Although the Kalenderhane itself has been restored, it is surrounded by ruins which have presented a puzzle for archaeologists. For now, we generally use the interpretation of Matthews. This website has some excellent photos, all of which are labeled ‘Isa Kapisi Mescidi’ a name that refers to a building which lies some kilometres to the west.
The first church on the site was built in the sixth century. Its apse survives, owing to its protected location hard against the Aqueduct of Valens.
The arch at the bottom leads into the apse of the 6th century church. At left is the aqueduct, at right is the late 12th century church
The current church appears to be largely from the late 12th century although its foundations seem to be from a church of similar dimensions built in or around the 800s.
Massive brick pier from the north side of the church, possibly part of the dome support of the 6th century church
The apse of the first church is currently (summer 2017) seeing service as a dormitory for otherwise homeless men.
Apse of first church
From the apse, one finds the entrance to the prosthesis. The two chapels either side of the central apse in the main church have been bricked up and are not accessible in the usual way. Pictures from 1914 show them to have been accessible from the naos, as one would expect.
Connection between 6th century apse and 12th century church
There is something of a jumble of stonework in parts of the eastern end of the complex, where building styles of three eras intersect.
6th, 8th and 12th century masonry, with some 20th century space-filling
On the eastern end of the south exterior wall of the church is the entrance to a chapel. Investigations in the 1960s revealed some lovely frescoes of the life of St Francis of Assisi. These were added during the Latin occupation (1204 – 1261) in about 1250. The frescoes, together with the only surviving pre-iconoclastic mosaic in the church, are now in the Archaeological Museum.
Fresco from Chapel of St Francis of Assisi
Classic scene of St Francis as friend to animals
The minaret is very recent, being rebuilt during Kuban ad Striker’s restoration. Liddell reports seeing the muezzin calling the ezan from a high stone in the 1950s. The picture below from 1951 shows how much the building has changed since then. I struggled to recognise it as Kalenderhane until I looked at van Millingen’s illustrations.
Striker and Kuban carried out the definitive study of the church and its surroundings in the 15 years from the time Striker gained permission to break the lock of the derelict hulk in 1966. They have traced the identity of the main Kalenderhane church as part of a monastery dedicated to the Mother of God who Reigns in Majesty (Theotokos Kyriotissa) on the basis of inscriptions found in the church. A review and summary by Robert Ousterhoult of the first volume of their published study may be found here. The great Dogan Kuban still takes breakfast occasionally on the terrace of the Adahan Hotel.
Kalenderhane in the snow.
6th century columns in the north window.
The main church is constructed of alternating courses of stone and brick. It forms a Greek cross with semi-circular section barrel vaulting over the four arms. The scalloped edge of the 16-rib dome was restored in the 1970s and looks very different from the 1950s incarnation of the church.
Remains of fresco over the nave entrance.
The really distinctive feature of this church is the marble revetment. This includes some elaborately carved marble icon frames either side of where the iconostasis was placed.
Icon frame on the north side of the church. The arched (former) entrance to the prothesis can be seen at lower left
Southern interior wall of naos; over central entrance
Detail of section in above photo
The St Francis chapel is in the area of the diaconicon on the south-east corner of the church.
The vault has remains of fresco decoration
This is the vault in which the fresco cycle of the life of Francis of Assisi was found
Some eccentric brickwork on the south-western corner
Flanking the present-day south and north walls of the church are parallel walls that are partially destroyed. According to Matthews, these marked the extent of aisles either side of the main nave that were destroyed in Ottoman times.
Wall of the erstwhile northern aisle, a few metres from the aqueduct
Part of the wall of the southern aisle
Several marble column capitals lie on the southern side of the church
Matthews, Thomas (2001): The Byzantine Churches of Istanbul. Institute of Fine Arts, New York University. Available at http://www.nyu.edu/gsas/dept/fineart/html/Byzantine/ Retrieved 16 Oct 2017
Müller-Weiner, Wolfgang (1977) Bildlexikon zur Topographie Istanbuls (Deutsches Archäologisches Institut) Verlag Ernst Wasmuth Tübingen
Ousterhout, Robert (2000): Contextualizing the Later Churches of Constantinople: Suggested Methodologies and a Few Examples. Dumbarton Oaks Papers No: 54. Washington D.C. Text available at:http://www.doaks.org/resources/publications/dumbarton-oaks-papers/dop54/dp54ch13.pdf Retrieved 16 Oct 2017
Van Millingen, Alexander (1912): The Byzantine Churches of Istanbul. Available at http://www.gutenberg.org/files/29077/29077-h/29077-h.htm Retrieved 16 Oct 2017
Posted June 27, 2014 Posted by Adam in Uncategorized
This was burnt down just as van Millingen was publishing his magisterial survey of Constantinople’s Byzantine churches and he included a couple of sad commemorative pictures of the ruin. It was in a sad state and serving as a rubbish dump when Mamboury was writing in 1951. Freely reported that it was a ‘mere shell’ in the late 1970s. It was a surprise, then, to be presented with this neat little gem when I headed downhill from Laleli Camii on a winter day at the end of 1990 (41.008597,28.955632). It is perhaps a little too neat to be true to its original appearance but it stands there looking like the archetypal Byzantine church and I rather like it. It does look a bit like a sculpture made out of stacks of coins, though.
Perhaps the real interest in this area comes with the bodrum (basement) rather than the cami. The church itself was built on a massive basement with one of the tallest crypts that has ever existed.
To the south-west of the church is an improbably large, circular open space paved with marble.
If you enter the Mirelion Çarşısı beneath this terrace, you will find a thriving Balkan fur trade conducted in a forest of Byzantine columns.
It appears to have had its genesis in someone’s desire to build a Pantheon-like rotunda here in the 5th century. The dome was never finished and in the early 10th century, the emperor decided to put the columns in and use the resulting structure as a foundation for a palace. The church attached to the palace was what we now see as Bodrum Camii. The rotunda was later used as a cistern, then sat about in a derelict state for a few centuries until someone thought of selling furs (and luggage) there.
Sub-zero Bodrum
Shop in the crypt
Posted June 27, 2014 Posted by Adam in Uncategorized
This is in an area on the western slope of the hill below Süleymaniye that is earmarked for urban renewal (41.016296,28.960165). As of 2014, most of the surrounding houses are in ruins and used by the eskici as temporary warehouses and sorting yards. The church itself is dirty and unkempt. I like it that way. It means that it has not yet undergone one of the municipal homogenisations that have befallen so many of the other historic buildings in the district. It has the world’s grumpiest bekçi who has an extensive vegetable garden at the back.
It’s an odd building with a wide, arch-and-column porch on the entrance side (14th century) and a very traditional looking four-column church (variously dated as 8th to 12th century). The great joy of this church is the treasure hunt through its building materials for recycled sculpture from as far back as the 5th century.
Kilesi Camii after a light snowfall
January 2015. The neighbourhood houses are scheduled to disappear soon.
Vefa Camii from the south.
Oddly, the brick minaret adds to the building. It is a handsome fluted design and fits in with the spirit of the rest of the place by reusing older Byzantine bits that were lying around.
The theme of recycling is evident in the outer narthex where some 5th century columns are still doing sterling service. The south dome has some barely disguised frescoes of a similar design to those in the dome of the parekklesion of Kariye Camii. The central dome has the kind of texture that suggests that significant mosaics have crumbled away. The inner narthex is swathed in virginal white plaster. There has been some laser measurement going on in early 2015 so a restoration might be in the offing. Maybe someone will uncover some decoration.
The nave is a pristine white mosque interior. It is probably not a good idea to congratulate the imam on the beauty of his church. I did. He used dignity and humour to make me feel silly.
Central dome of outer narthex
south dome of outer narthex
recycled columns in the outer narthex
Inner narthex. Who knows what lies under that plaster?
The nave. Business as usual in the cami.
Miniaturk's doll's house version of Molla Gurani Camii
Posted June 27, 2014 Posted by Adam in Uncategorized
For the post-restoration church, click here.
This is on the main artery of Vatan Caddesi, shrouded with scaffolding in 2014 and enduring one of Fatih Belediyesi’s uncompromising restorations. It’s an awkward-looking building, an agglomeration of different churches and bits built on. The two bulging domes give it the aspect of a cartoon frog. Some of the foundations date from the 6th century and the two main churches come from the 10th and the late 11th centuries. The charm is in the details. There was some nice sculpture here. The brick swastika decoration on the eastern façade was pretty. There are some chapels on the roof. Let’s see what the restoration does with it. (41.014863,28.943878)
Feneri Isa Camii on an October night in 2010.
The view from Vatan Caddesi.
Part of a frieze from the Church of the Panachrantos in the Archaeological Museum of Istanbul
The mescit that served worshippers during the restoration has been demolished (August 2017)
Brickwork on the central apse of the south church
August 2017: Some of the stonework placement looks a bit rough
September 2017: The temporary mescit has been demolished and the restored mosque looks ready to enter service.
Final touches are made to the restored domes
As of July 2019, the restoration is complete and the mosque is open for use.
Posted June 27, 2014 Posted by Adam in Uncategorized
This little rectangle is in an IETT bus depot on Millet Caddesi near Topkapı (41.017439,28.928287). It is probably the remains of something much larger but, for now, it serves as the place of worship for the drivers. It has a couple of nice columns with Byzantine capitals.
It’s quiet and peaceful in there, unlike the chaos outside. Sometimes, it’s locked, sometimes it isn’t.
Across Millet Caddesi (41.018702,28.928126), Kürkçübaşı Ahmed Şemseddin Camii (1511) has a porch supported by a row of Byzantine columns that have clearly seen service in an earlier building. Van Millingen suggests that these came from a substantial building belonging to the 13th century monastery of which Manastir Mescidi is the only remaining intact part.
As of November 2016, Kürkçübaşı Ahmed Şemseddin Camii is closed for fairly massive renovation. The porch has disappeared and the columns are currently standing in a row on their own. The rest of the building has been stripped back to bare stone and much of that has been replaced.
« Previous Entries Next Entries »